Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5864 14
Original file (NR5864 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NT

i]

F THE NAVY

ACO ADOTA
wit

in

POARD FOR COR ection OF NAVAL REG! WDE

Anon

701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

BAN
Docket No.NRO5864-14

10 October 2014

 

rection to your naval

This is in reference to your application for Cor
section

record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code,
1552.

of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,

BR three-member panel
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October

2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the
advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420
PERS-806 of 17 Jul 2014, @ copy of which was provided to you on 1.
August 2014, and is being provided to you now.
After careful and conscientious consideration of
e e

vidence submitted w

—
Y

 

record, the Board found that the
to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In making this Jetermination, the Board concurred with the comments

contained in the advisory opinion. noecordingly, your application has

been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that

favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
In this regard, it ig important to keep in mind that a
official records.
Consequently, when appiying for
record, the burden is on the applican

probable material error oF injustice.

t

aaa eet aT

to de

Since

Docket No .NRO5864-14

ot an aArtiocrteal naval

or 1 OLlsavsGee +

monstrate the existence of

ely,

et!

“Ltt. by ty ly LLL ip

V &oomrr li NEILL

Executive Director

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3396 14

    Original file (NR3396 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments your application has contained in the advisory opinion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5473 14

    Original file (NR5473 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3980 14

    Original file (NR3980 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 21 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9699 14

    Original file (NR9699 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NPS69S-14 rection of an official naval Consequently, when applying for a cor demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4261 14

    Original file (NR4261 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DJC Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion Furnished by NPC memo 1811 Pers- 835/070 dated 30 December 2014, a COpy of which was provided to you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5281 14

    Original file (NR5281 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 17 June 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3051 14

    Original file (NR3051 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9162 14

    Original file (NR9162 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative C a “ a i regulations ana procedures appilt e Board. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7873 14

    Original file (NR7873 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. hiter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3930-13

    Original file (NR3930-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2013. of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.