NT
i]
F THE NAVY
ACO ADOTA
wit
in
POARD FOR COR ection OF NAVAL REG! WDE
Anon
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NRO5864-14
10 October 2014
rection to your naval
This is in reference to your application for Cor
section
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code,
1552.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
BR three-member panel
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October
2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the
advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420
PERS-806 of 17 Jul 2014, @ copy of which was provided to you on 1.
August 2014, and is being provided to you now.
After careful and conscientious consideration of
e e
vidence submitted w
—
Y
record, the Board found that the
to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In making this Jetermination, the Board concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. noecordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
In this regard, it ig important to keep in mind that a
official records.
Consequently, when appiying for
record, the burden is on the applican
probable material error oF injustice.
t
aaa eet aT
to de
Since
Docket No .NRO5864-14
ot an aArtiocrteal naval
or 1 OLlsavsGee +
monstrate the existence of
ely,
et!
“Ltt. by ty ly LLL ip
V &oomrr li NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3396 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments your application has contained in the advisory opinion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5473 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3980 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 21 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9699 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NPS69S-14 rection of an official naval Consequently, when applying for a cor demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4261 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DJC Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion Furnished by NPC memo 1811 Pers- 835/070 dated 30 December 2014, a COpy of which was provided to you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5281 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 17 June 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3051 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9162 14
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative C a “ a i regulations ana procedures appilt e Board. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7873 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. hiter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3930-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2013. of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.